On Oct 6, 8:29 am, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you (or something else) have something to say about Beaker? > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the > players are (for instance how Beaker does compare with flup?)
Beaker is the only seriously maintained WSGI session at the moment -- flup isn't, AFAIK, very actively maintained or improved. paste.session is a particularly naive implementation of sessions. So as a result, Beaker is kind of the only game in town. Incidentally, it's not really related to SQLAlchemy; it came out of Myghty. Same author, of course, but fairly different domains. Ian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
