Hallöchen! Ferenczi Viktor writes:
> [...] > > Class decorators allows clean implementation of properties. > Detailed description: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3129/ > Lets use a hypothetic library providing properties, for example: > > from property_support import hasProperties, Property > > @hasProperties > class Sphere(object): > def setRadius(self, value): > ... some setter implementation ... > radius=Property(default=1.0, set=setRadius, type=(int, float)) > color=Property(default='black', allowNone=True) > > This is a cleaner syntax if you need automatic default > setter/getter implementations with type checking, default values, > etc. Well, I think @hasProperties is very ugly. Such things always look like a dirty trick. The programmer wonders why the language cannot detect by itself that there are properties in this class. But anyway ... would these properties finally be virtual? Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (See http://ime.webhop.org for ICQ, MSN, etc.) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
