> > Properties are very useful, since ordinary attribute access can be > > transparently replaced with properties if the developer needs to > > add code when it's set or needs to calculate it's value whenever > > it is read. > > I totally agree. I like to use properties. However, Python already > has properties. Their syntax is quite nice in my opinion, and > rather explicit, too. Their only flaw is that they are not > "virtual" (in C++ speak). In other words, you can't pass a "self" > parameter to them.
Thanks for your comment. I'm going to elaborate on this issue. - Viktor -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
