Carsten Haese wrote: > This seems to confirm my suspicion that the do_something_with function > doesn't actually need a reference to the module, it only needs a > reference to the function to call. > > Maybe your hurdle is how to obtain a reference to a function from the > current module when all you have is the name of the function in a > string. The answer to that would be "globals()[funcname]".
This is like a bad case of phone-tag. Please see my response to your previous post for why this does not seem feasible to me. James -- James Stroud UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics Box 951570 Los Angeles, CA 90095 http://www.jamesstroud.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
