Chris Mellon wrote: > On 7/30/07, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: >>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:32:55 -0400, Steve Holden wrote: >>> >>>> >>> [x for x in xrange(0, 101)] == [y for y in xrange(101)] >>>> True >>> First I thought: Why the unnecessary list comprehension but to my surprise: >>> >>> In [33]: xrange(42) == xrange(42) >>> Out[33]: False >>> >>> That's strange. >>> >> Not so strange really. The two xrange objects are different (though I >> confess I haven't looked to see how they implement comparisons), but >> iterating over them produces the same result. > > > nitpick: list(xrange(42)) == list(xrange(42)) is slightly more concise > than the list comp..
Indeed. I wonder if anyone will pick a nit with the nit you picked on my nitpick ... nitty-gritti-ly y'rs - steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden --------------- Asciimercial ------------------ Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag the Internet Many services currently offer free registration ----------- Thank You for Reading ------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
