[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Jul 30, 11:42 am, "Chris Mellon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:32:55 -0400, Steve Holden wrote: >>>>> >>> [x for x in xrange(0, 101)] == [y for y in xrange(101)] >>>>> True > >> nitpick: list(xrange(42)) == list(xrange(42)) is slightly more concise >> than the list comp.. > > Not that it has anything to do with this topic anymore, but I find the > list comp a bit clearer for expressing the thought 'each element in > one is the same as the coresponding element in the other, or: the > sequences are identical' -- the list() version would proabably have > had me going 'huh?' even longer ^_^. > -- > [star for star in weaver]
Here's another one, a little more obscure still, but only valid in 2.5 because of all(): >>> all(x==y for (x, y) in zip(xrange(0, 101), xrange(101))) True >>> regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden --------------- Asciimercial ------------------ Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag the Internet Many services currently offer free registration ----------- Thank You for Reading ------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
