Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pretending that False and True are just "magic names" for 0 and 1 might be > "easier" than real boolean algebra, but that puts the cart before the > horse. Functionality comes first: Python has lists and dicts and sets > despite them not being ints, and somehow newcomers cope. I'm sure they > will cope with False and True not being integers either.
Are they are aren't they? print 1 in [True] print 1 == True print len(set(map(type, [1, 1]))) print len(set(map(type, [1, True]))) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
