CBFalconer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Peter J. Holzer" wrote: > > Hardly. That hasn't been in use for over 35 years (according to > > Wikipedia). > > I am glad to see you depend on absolutely reliable sources.
Wikipedia is not an absolutely reliable source. I know of no "absolutely resliable source". We work with imperfect human-provided data all the time. -- \ "If you ever teach a yodeling class, probably the hardest thing | `\ is to keep the students from just trying to yodel right off. | _o__) You see, we build to that." -- Jack Handey | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
