On 4 Jul, 22:18, "Peter J. Holzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > But it really doesn't matter much. If you ignore leap seconds, using > days instead of seconds is just a constant factor (in fact, the unix > timestamp ignores leap seconds, too, so it's always a constant factor). > You can't represent a second exactly if the unit is one day (1/86400 is > not a multiple of a power of two), but that probably doesn't matter.
Sure. However, the proposal was to define ticks as 25 microseconds. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
