Ilias Lazaridis wrote:Diez B. Roggisch wrote:[...] - (ungentle babbling after disrupting coherence of writings)Should a professional developer take python serious?
And that from you.... *lol*
Of course.
I respect the "coherence of writings" of my conversation partners.
[If they are in-topic / in-context]
I mean, if the team does not manage at least the foundation of a multi-target automated-build-process?
Repeating nonsense doesn't increase it's validity. Python makes use of
[...] - (babbling, gentle links)
Thank you for the links.
They are irrelevant for me.
But other readers for sure will enjoy.
-
The automated-build-process-system should allow community-members to add their targets into an special "incubation section", which does not in any way affect the "main section" (which contains the official production targets).
If an "incubation section" target proves over time as stable and supported, it is moved to the "official-auto-build".
[targets need not to be supported directly by the python team. They could be added/managed/maintained by community members]
You already found the mingw-patch for building python. It is added/managed/maintained by community members.
This is a one-man-show, which does not invite to open collaboration (feedback is requested to closed email):
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/98fa42dabff68db2
python [foundation, crew, dictator, ...] should engourage open collaboration, should engourage _collaboration_.
Just out of curiousity: How many python extensions are you planning to
write?
I estimate 10 to 100, depending on abstractional capabilities of the extension system.
And how many lines of pure python code have you written in your life?
0 (zero).
.
-- http://lazaridis.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list