Hi, Leonard J. Reder wrote: > Stefan Behnel wrote: >> http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify.html > > Looks like this stuff might do what I want. Need to work through the > example. > > Are you the author?
Yup! :) > Why is this better then using gnossis? lxml is faster and supports more XML standards. It's also more flexible in that it allows you to replace element classes at basically any granularity and thus add things to the Element API or even replace it as you see fit, without loosing the standard XML features. You can even do that at the C-level, in case you really need high-performance. See the "extending lxml" section in the side menu at http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/ especially: http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/element_classes.html Stefan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
