Stefan, This package is looking better I tried the validation example, but it did not work with 1.3beta so I grabbed 1.2. If objectify works well I think this is a great pick for anyone using xml. Please post to me and the python announce when 1.3 is released.
thanks, Len Stefan Behnel wrote: > Hi, > > Leonard J. Reder wrote: >> Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify.html >> Looks like this stuff might do what I want. Need to work through the >> example. >> >> Are you the author? > > Yup! :) > > >> Why is this better then using gnossis? > > lxml is faster and supports more XML standards. It's also more flexible in > that it allows you to replace element classes at basically any granularity and > thus add things to the Element API or even replace it as you see fit, without > loosing the standard XML features. You can even do that at the C-level, in > case you really need high-performance. > > See the "extending lxml" section in the side menu at > http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/ > especially: > http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/element_classes.html > > Stefan -- =================================== Leonard J. Reder Home office email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lab email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lab web page : http://reder.jpl.nasa.gov =================================== -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
