John Nagle wrote: > Neither Lisp nor Python is an "industrial strength language". > The infrastructure is too weak. Hosting providers and distro > makers aren't concerned over whether Python works. They > care if C, C++, Java, PHP, and Perl work, but not Python or LISP. > Ask them. > > John Nagle
In your excitement to post a sweeping and inaccurate generalization (you missed diss'ing Ruby), I think you may have missed the point of my post. I surely wasn't trying to restart a dead thread, I just thought it was funny that there was a similarity to a line from Princess Bride in the thread (see relevant part below that you cut out). If you want to restart a debate, please go back and reply to some serious post in the thread - don't hijack mine for your own evil purposes and cut out the good parts - did you even see the movie? George Sakkis wrote: > You keep using that phrase. I don't think it means what you think it > means. [Vizzini has just cut the rope The Dread Pirate Roberts is climbing up] Vizzini: HE DIDN'T FALL? INCONCEIVABLE. Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
