Brian Adkins wrote:
> John Nagle wrote:
>
>> Neither Lisp nor Python is an "industrial strength language".
>> The infrastructure is too weak. Hosting providers and distro
>> makers aren't concerned over whether Python works. They
>> care if C, C++, Java, PHP, and Perl work, but not Python or LISP.
>> Ask them.
>>
>> John Nagle
>
>
> In your excitement to post a sweeping and inaccurate generalization (you
> missed diss'ing Ruby), I think you may have missed the point of my post.
> I surely wasn't trying to restart a dead thread, I just thought it was
> funny that there was a similarity to a line from Princess Bride in the
> thread (see relevant part below that you cut out).
>
> If you want to restart a debate, please go back and reply to some
> serious post in the thread - don't hijack mine for your own evil
> purposes and cut out the good parts - did you even see the movie?
Yes. I think George did, too. (I was wondering what you were up to.)
:)
kt
>
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > You keep using that phrase. I don't think it means what you think it
> > means.
>
> [Vizzini has just cut the rope The Dread Pirate Roberts is climbing up]
> Vizzini: HE DIDN'T FALL? INCONCEIVABLE.
> Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
> you think it means.
--
Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and
I'm happy to state I finally won out over it.
-- Elwood P. Dowd
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.
-- Elwood's Mom
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
