You could write it as a web app, with an executable which launches the server and points a browser at it.
Python GUI work is a bit of a drag, really. One of the worst things about it, IMHO. -T Vincent Delporte wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:23:10 +0100, Christophe Cavalaria > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >They use QT. Back to read the first part of your post. > > It doesn't make much difference: > - QT is big, so even small apps carry a lot of baggage > - by not using the native widgets, you're dependent on that layer to > keep up with changes in the look & feel of the platform (eg. XP's > widgets that look different from previous widgets). > > Bottom line: GUI apps are better off extracting the maximum amount of > logic into OS-agnostic code, and then rewrite the GUI for each > platform. > > Even better: Considering that Windows has a 95% market share, make > doubly-sure that it makes financial sense to provide a cross-platform > GUI application (the server can be written in text mode, and can then > be available for multiple OS's with no major problem). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
