Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the Lispies see "more dynamism" as a good thing Sure... > I mean "dynamic" in a less good way-- there is a huge amount of > state scattered all through a running Python program, that the > application can modify at random and whose contents the working of > really fundamental operations like method invocation. That's what I call /kludgy/, not /dynamic/ ;-) > How about if I say Python and Lisp are both dynamic, but Lisp does a > better job of keeping its dynamism's potentially chaotic effects > contained. Does that help? Yes, that's fine with me! -- (espen) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
