Paul Rubin wrote: > I think the Lispies see "more dynamism" as a good thing and are > therefore defending their language from suggestions that Python is > even more dynamic than Lisp. I mean "dynamic" in a less good way--
Indeed, Python has sometimes been described as "pathologically dynamic". All that dynamism is handy sometimes, but it does get in the way of improving efficiency. Often discussions take place on python-dev about ways to selectively limit the dynamism to make some optimisation possible. -- Greg -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
