Yes -- help me rally behind my generic object PEP which proposes a Bunch type (probably to be renamed) for the Python standard lib. =)
Did you see the suggestion of 'namespace' as a name? Given that the idea is to get access to the contents using the standard Python syntax for accessing module and class namespaces, it seems to make sense.
Michael Spencer also posted an interesting idea recently about setting up a view of an existing dictionary, rather than as a separate object:
class attr_view(object):
def __init__(self, data):
object.__setattr__(self, "_data", data)
def __getattr__(self, attrname):
return self._data[attrname]
def __setattr__(self, attrname, value):
self._data[attrname] = valueCheers, Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
