Georg Brandl wrote: > What has a better chance of success in my eyes is an extension to yield > all items from an iterable without using an explicit for loop: instead of > > for item in iterable: > yield item > > you could write > > yield from iterable > > or > > yield *iterable
Since this is nothing but an alternate way to spell a very specific (and not-too-common) for loop, I expect this has zero chance of success. Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
