Carl Banks wrote: > Georg Brandl wrote: >> What has a better chance of success in my eyes is an extension to yield >> all items from an iterable without using an explicit for loop: instead of >> >> for item in iterable: >> yield item >> >> you could write >> >> yield from iterable >> >> or >> >> yield *iterable > > Since this is nothing but an alternate way to spell a very specific > (and not-too-common) for loop, I expect this has zero chance of > success.
well, it could also be optimized internally, i.e. with a new opcode. Georg -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
