John Machin wrote: > Ant wrote: > > John Machin wrote: > > ... > > > A little more is unfortunately not enough. The best advice you got was > > > to use an existing e-mail address validator. > > > > We got bitten by this at the last place I worked - we were using a > > regex email validator (from Microsoft IIRC) ... > Oh, sorry for the abbreviation. "use" implies "source from believedly > reliable s/w source; test; then deploy" :-)
I actually meant that we got bitten by using a regex validator, not by using an existing one. Though we did get bitten by an existing one, and it being from Microsoft we should have known better ;-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
