alex23 wrote: > lazaridis_com wrote: > > The "persist case" evaluates python persistency systems (or > > mechanisms), and will show my personal preference: > > Do you feel that evaluating-for-evaluation's-sake produces a more > measured understanding of the value of a product than that taken from > its use in, say, actual development?
I don't evaluate for "evaluating-for-evaluation's-sake", see the home page of the project: "The project selects Open Source Subsystems for integration into a Coherent Software Production System. " http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki . -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
