Antoon Pardon a écrit : > On 2006-07-31, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Antoon Pardon wrote: >>(snip) >> >>>Sure it is usefull. It may be not 100% formally correct, but often >>>things that are not 100% formally correct can be better in bringing >>>an idea accross. >> >>hear hear... >> >>And yet you still fail to understand why I claimed Python didn't have >>variables ? Talk about stubborness :( > > > I don't think it is usefull to claim Python has no variables. > Yes, we know, thanks, good night. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: Nested function scope pr... danielx
- Re: Nested function scope pr... Edmond Dantes
- Re: Nested function scope problem Antoon Pardon
- Re: Nested function scope problem Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: Nested function scope proble... Slawomir Nowaczyk
- Re: Nested function scope pr... Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: Nested function scope pr... Slawomir Nowaczyk
- Re: Nested function scope pr... Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: Nested function scope pr... Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: Nested function scope problem Antoon Pardon
- Re: Nested function scope problem Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Nested function scope problem Bill Pursell
- Re: Nested function scope problem Slawomir Nowaczyk
- Re: Nested function scope problem enigmadude
- Re: Nested function scope problem Gabriel Genellina