On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:10:44 +0100, rumours say that "Fredrik Lundh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> might have written:
>Mike Moum wrote:
>> s.atoi('4',3) should result in 11
>>
>> s.atoi('13',4) should result in 31
>>
>> s.atoi('12',4) should result in 30
>>
>> s.atoi('8',4) is legitimate, but it generates an error.
>>
>> Is this a bug, or am I missing something obvious?
>the function's named "atoi", not "atoitoa".
<automatic_effbot_post_translator_powered_by_python>
s.itoa(4,3) should result in '11'
s.itoa(13,4) should result in '31'
s.itoa(12,4) should result in '30'
s.itoa(8,4) should result in '20'
s.atoi('4', 3) should fail
s.atoi('13', 4) should result in 7
s.atoi('12', 4) should result in 6
s.atoi('8', 4) should fail
</automatic_effbot_post_translator_powered_by_python> :)
--
TZOTZIOY, I speak England very best.
"Be strict when sending and tolerant when receiving." (from RFC1958)
I really should keep that in mind when talking with people, actually...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
