Nick Coghlan wrote: > > If this only has to work for classes created for the purpose (rather than > for an arbitrary class): >
Certainly a step into the direction I meant - but still missing type declarations. And that's what at least I'd like to see - as otherwise you don't know what kind of editing widget to use for a property. -- Regards, Diez B. Roggisch -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
