Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > > If this only has to work for classes created for the purpose (rather than > > for an arbitrary class): > > Certainly a step into the direction I meant - but still missing type > declarations. And that's what at least I'd like to see - as otherwise you > don't know what kind of editing widget to use for a property.
Though it may be overkill for your needs, you'll be interested in Enthought's "Traits", I think; see, for example, <http://python.fyxm.net/pycon/papers/traits.html>. Facilitating such presentation tasks (no doubt including editing) appears to be a major driving force for Traits. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
