> Is there a reason NOT to use them?  If a classic class works fine, what
> incentive is there to switch to new style classes?  

Perhaps classic classes will eventually disappear? It seems strange
(and is difficult to explain to my peers) that a language offers two
different ways to define a standard class.

Sw.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to