Simon Wittber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there a reason NOT to use them? If a classic class works fine, what > > incentive is there to switch to new style classes? > > Perhaps classic classes will eventually disappear?
It just means that the formerly "classic" syntax will define a new-style class. Try to write code that works either way. It would be nice if a __future__ directive were added right now (if it's not there already) that processes all class definitions as new-style. Otherwise there's no easy way to test for compatibility. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
