I am a strong -1 on this. On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 2:41 PM Shreyan Avigyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> André Roberge: > > My own email specifically referred to two instances where I found it > necessary to **modify** methods that are indicated as being private as > their names begin with double underscores. So, I am strongly opposed to > your suggestion. > > Actually as I explained in this comment > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/426EPANCVEGZV2AZL7MWNG67BTZMORNG > I'm never suggesting to make member methods non-modifiable. I'm suggesting > to add a keyword that can make **member variables** non-modifiable. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XCLFUC7FITXGDMYZGONBKXCBUBSYAK5O/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born, become abortifacients against new conceptions.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/I6VYDNWP25ZNLG3KYXAIFMFP2JD2NRRC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
