On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 11:22 AM Shreyan Avigyan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Quoting the entire content:

Again. See what I suggested. I changed my suggestion from "Private" to
> "Non-modifiable member variables".
>

I have no idea if this is in response to my own email or someone else as
you do not include any context.

My own email specifically referred to two instances where I found it
necessary to **modify** methods that are indicated as being private as
their names begin with double underscores. So, I am strongly opposed to
your suggestion.

André Roberge




> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LSOF6LE2PSHFCFLMTKQVZTA5XYUHZNNN/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DDVTP3THZMXAPCYVJDSPLQOE2W5KCGIM/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to