Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > pyOpenSSL is stable, in production use and > has a decent API. The ssl module is good enough for HTTPS client > use. pyOpenSSL provides a robust server side implementation with > all the required certificate and context handling needed for this. > > We could tell people to use the ssl module for clients and > pyOpenSSL for the server side and perhaps integrate the OpenSSL > package into the ssl namespace.
In this case, this should be decided early, so that I know if I should continue caring about the ssl module or not. I'm not interested in maintaining potentially obsolete code. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8998> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com