Tadek Kijkowski <tkijkow...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I went with Paul's suggestion and added nargs='**' instead of greedy, so at 
this moment this PR doesn't introduce any changes in any public signatures.

I'm working on 'capture' actions, but I want that to be a separate PR and a 
separate issue because - first - it may be harder to accept as it is bigger 
change in both code and documentation and - second - it actually is a separate 
feature, which could be useful for optional arguments even without nargs='**' 
implemented.

So, what do you all think about this PR as it now? Docs and tests are updated.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42973>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to