Tadek Kijkowski <tkijkow...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Paul, > The basic logic of argparse is to accept optionals in any order, and > positionals in strict positional order. 'nargs' allows us to pair any number > of strings with each optional's flag. I started this issue because that was insufficient for my project. > I wonder if adding a new nargs, such as '**' would be better than than the > new parameter 'greedy_star=True'. Yeah, I considered that earlier, but I thought that would be too much effort to review all the places where it would have to be treated as equal to '*'. But now I agree with you, I'll try to change that. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42973> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
