Vladimir Matveev <desco...@gmail.com> added the comment:
No, I don't think so but I can definitely make one. A few questions first:
- having PySendResult as a result type of PyIterSend seems ok, however prefix
for each concrete value (PYGEN_*) is not aligned with the prefix of the
function itself (PyIter_)
- should it also deal with tstate->c_tracefunc (probably not) or just be
something like
```
PySendResult
PyIter_Send(PyObject *iter, PyObject *arg, PyObject **result)
{
_Py_IDENTIFIER(send);
assert(result != NULL);
if (PyGen_CheckExact(iter) || PyCoro_CheckExact(iter)) {
return PyGen_Send((PyGenObject *)iter, arg, result);
}
if (arg == Py_None && Py_TYPE(iter)->tp_iternext != NULL) {
*result = Py_TYPE(iter)->tp_iternext(iter);
}
else {
*result = _PyObject_CallMethodIdOneArg(iter, &PyId_send, arg);
}
if (*result == NULL) {
if (_PyGen_FetchStopIterationValue(result) == 0) {
return PYGEN_RETURN;
}
return PYGEN_ERROR;
}
return PYGEN_NEXT;
}
```
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41756>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
