Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I agree that we should add PyIter_Send() (the name is discussable, but PyIter_Send LGTM) which should support iterators and objects with the send() method. It would be much more useful for user, and can replace PyGen_Send() in the interpreter core code. But merging the PR with PyGen_Send() was not a mistake. It was good to split the changes on smaller steps easier to review. Vladimir, do you mind to create a new PR for PyIter_Send()? I seen its implementation in one of intermediate versions of your PR. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41756> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
