Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> [...] and then making algorithmic improvements later. Though thinking about it, there is *one* catch: for the random module, it's nice if reproducibility isn't broken more often than necessary in released versions, so it would be best to do any algorithmic tweaking *before* 3.9.0 is released. But that still gives us some time ... ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37439> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
