Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> You are right, the issue is "theoretical", I didn't see problems with current > implementation. > The self-pipe buffer is pretty big, a chance to reach its limit is relatively > low. Actually, I disagree. The problem manifests itself easily when you orchestrate a big number of subprocesses (think 1000s). I've implemented a different strategy for signals handling in uvloop [1] and I think we can easily employ similar approach in asyncio. Please keep this open. [1] https://github.com/MagicStack/uvloop/commit/6e03e513625eb544a5f60c9bf9922019fc3a0b29 ---------- resolution: rejected -> status: closed -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35749> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
