Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svet...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Victor, thanks for the message. I forgot mentioned changes. You are right, the issue is "theoretical", I didn't see problems with current implementation. The self-pipe buffer is pretty big, a chance to reach its limit is relatively low. But a change to break asyncio on some OS with the patch is much higher. Moreover, the patch assumes that python signal handler will be called *before* reading from self-pipe. Otherwise, a signal callback will be postponed up to next writing to the pipe, which looks like a hidden bug. Let's close the issue. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35749> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
