Tal Einat <talei...@gmail.com> added the comment:

> The squeezed text is impairing IDLE's usability for teaching purposes.

I sincerely hoped it would achieve the opposite! I'm happy to do any work 
necessary to improve its usability in this context.

The auto-squeezing can be "disabled" easily by setting the minimum # lines to a 
high number in the config dialog.

> Typing help() on any built-in type such as str immediately results in a 
> squeeze-button rather than displaying help.  The same is true for showing 
> lines from a file read or from a URL.

A quick double-click will expand the "Squeezed text" label. Also, right-click 
-> "View" will open the output in a viewer window; for long "help(str)" output 
I find this better than having it in the midst of the normal output.

> Also, I think this may be the logic that is slowing down successive print 
> calls in a loop.

Can you give more details? In comparison to what do you find it slow? I did a 
quick comparison between a recent 3.8.0a build and 3.7.0 (without Squeezer) on 
a Win10 machine, and both seemed to take the same time to run those loops (~3.5 
seconds for the first loop, ~4.5 seconds for the second loop).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35196>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to