Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment: > _OR_ adding AbstractServer to the documentation and changing existing > references to asyncio.Server to point at asyncio.AbstractServer instead, as > that symbol is already exported but is not currently documented.
I completely missed the fact that we already export AbstractServer and that the documentation doesn't actually refer to it, and that it has less APIs than Server. Thanks for reminding me of that, Ron. I'll try to address the docs part before 3.7 comes out. > So, when binding on multiple interfaces there's a requirement that the SAME > port be chosen for all of the socket bindings, which can't easily be done > today with a single asyncio.Server object. That's a bit off-topic for this > issue, though. And why do you need a single Server object? ---------- versions: +Python 3.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue25749> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
