Ron Frederick <r...@timeheart.net> added the comment: In my original report, I suggested _either_ exporting asyncio.Server since that's what was documented elsewhere _OR_ adding AbstractServer to the documentation and changing existing references to asyncio.Server to point at asyncio.AbstractServer instead, as that symbol is already exported but is not currently documented. There appear to be good reasons for hiding the implementation details of Server, and I'm good with that. I just think the docs and the exports need to agree on one or the other.
I originally had references to AbstractServer in my project docs, but changed them to Server after seeing that only Server was currently in the public Python documentation. As for references to the "sockets" member of Server, I'm not currently relying on that in my code. I have code that can handle getaddrinfo() returning more than one address to listen on, but I create separate Server instances for each individual address right now, as this gives me better control when a caller asks to listen on a dynamic port on multiple interfaces at once. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue25749> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
