Josh Rosenberg added the comment: That would also work. The argument I'd give in favor of performing a pass that replaces it with a literal True or False is that you don't have update as many places, don't have to worry about missing a place, and you don't have to decide if __debug__ is a reference to True or False, or a new object entirely.
It's just too easy to miss a case where __debug__ should be special and not notice (because optimizations aren't heavily tested for specific byte code outputs or anything), where a missed optimization for the True or False constant is much less likely to go unnoticed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27169> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
