New submission from Josh Rosenberg: Issue #22091 points out a quirk in the compile function and use of the __debug__ "constant" causing inconsistent behavior when the optimize level of the compile call differs from that of the main interpreter; __debug__ in an `if` or `while` statement is compiled out, but all other uses load it dynamically (at runtime), so in a mixed environment (interpreter at optimization=0, compile at optimize=2), you get non-obvious behavior.
This behavior appears to be a consequence of __debug__ being handled by a special case for the `if` and `while` statements in compile.c that statements of that form to be compiled out, but *not* for similar constructs, e.g. `a if __debug__ else b` and `__debug__ or a` are always evaluated at runtime, whether or not `compile` is involved. The `expr_constant` function here https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/fd0ac7ba091e/Python/compile.c#l3542 is responsible for this (and only called in the same file, for `if` and `while` statements). I'm not sure I understand the peephole optimizer, but if it can operate recursively (that is, an initial replacement of A->B where B could be optimized from B->C is optimized in a subsequent pass, turning all uses of A to C eventually), it seems like the "correct" solution would be to piggyback on optimizations for True and False, by having the peephole optimizer replace LOAD_NAME/LOAD_GLOBAL for __debug__ with an appropriate LOAD_CONST, True or False, based on the compile environment. This would fix this bug (making __debug__ evaluate in the `compile` call, so the environment when the compiled code is executed doesn't matter), and it would optimize all the other cases that the current special cases for `if` and `while` don't cover by letting the recursive pass optimize them out the same way uses of literal True and False is optimized, so uses of ternary expressions, non-`if`/`while` boolean operations, and all other operations using __debug__ are optimized using a constant (and poss ibly optimized out of existence) without needing to independently maintain separate optimizations all over the codebase for __debug__. Might also allow the removal of the explicit special case for __debug__ in compile.c for `if` and `while`, simplifying that code a bit. This would fix the problem from #22091 and also make __debug__ reliably useful for "optimization", since all uses of it would "compile out" to optimized runtime code, where right now only two cases do so. Does this seem reasonable? Note: I added the nosy list from #22091 here, since that bug is really just a special case of this one for `compile` only. ---------- components: Interpreter Core messages: 266769 nosy: SilentGhost, arigo, eryksun, josh.r priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: __debug__ is not optimized out at compile time for anything but `if:` and `while:` blocks versions: Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27169> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
