Martin Panter added the comment: I’m sorry I only read your patch and did not see the NoLen class above Blocked. (I blame the lack of Reitveld review link.) I still think __getitem__() should have a valid signature, but I acknowledge that it’s not really your fault. :)
My main concern about the documentation was that in your patch you say _all_ special methods are now allowed to be None, but in your code you only check __iter__(). This is adding new undocumented inconsistencies e.g. with Iterable vs Container. Maybe it would be better to only say that setting __iter__ to None is supported, instead of setting any special method. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25864> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
