Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > If stdbool is not available, C99 still defines false and true as macros.
What do you mean by that? In C99, true and false are *not* defined in a translation unit unless stdbool.h is included, see 7.16. > If stdbool is available, then most compilers will define false and true > as macros. *In* the header file, that is. C99 *requires* the implementation to define true and false *only* in the header file, and *only* as macros. Anything else would not be conforming to C99. > In both cases, if stdbool was included by any system header in the > future, that would conflict with your current definition. No system header should ever include stdbool.h; doing so would be in violation of the standards. > Do you agree with these changes then? Not at all; I think the patch should be rejected. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2497> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
