Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Raymond wrote in his recent response on issue2499 (a patch that adds unary '+' and 'not' folding to peephole optimizer):
""" More importantly, we decided that the peepholer is the wrong place to do much of this work. Most of the peepholer is going to be migrated up the chain, after the AST is generated, but before the opcodes are generated. That is a faster, more reliable, and more general approach. """ (See msg64618.) This looks like the relevant patch. I would like to take a look at the patch, but since it is more than 2 years old, maybe someone has an updated version. Please advise. ---------- nosy: +belopolsky type: -> performance _____________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346238> _____________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
