Nadeem Vawda added the comment: > Recursive inline _check_can_read() will be enough. Now this check calls 4 > Python functions (_check_can_read(), readable(), _check_non_closed(), > closed). Recursive inlining only readable() in _check_can_read() is achieved > significant but less (about 30%) effect.
I've inlined readable() into _check_can_read() [3.3: 4258248a44c7 | default: abb5c5bde872]. This seems like a good balance between maximizing our performance in edge cases and not turning the code into a mess in the process ;) Once again, thanks for your contributions! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16034> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
