Carl Nobile <carl.nob...@gmail.com> added the comment: Yes, exactly. I was not the one who posted the original bug report, but I found it when I ran into the same problem. I was not exactly sure if the original poster had the same issues as I had. I do know that my fix to the code eliminated some code making the code a bit simpler. I could try to dig up my fix and send it to you if you want.
~Carl On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, André Cruz <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > André Cruz <an...@cabine.org> added the comment: > > As far as I can see, the patch does add some documentation changes. What > exactly is missing? > > As for the bug, if I understood correctly, what you are saying is that > when "ignore_continue" is True, and the server sends a 100 Continue > response, the code will continue to try to read data from the server even > though none is expected, is that right? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
