Carl Nobile <carl.nob...@gmail.com> added the comment: I was told some time ago that it was documentation changes. And, if I remember correctly CONTINUE (100) was not ignored, it was actually broken. Data was being read from stdin when a CONTINUE was received and this should never happen based on RFC 2616, because there will never be any data to read.
~Carl On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, André Cruz <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > André Cruz <an...@cabine.org> added the comment: > > Can anyone confirm what is missing for this patch to be committed? > > Is it just test and documentation changes or is something wrong with the > code changes as well? > > ---------- > nosy: +edevil > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
