Hynek Schlawack <h...@ox.cx> added the comment: > I really like the idea of adding extended attributes copy to shutil.cop2(). > However, I'm not convinced that exposing the raw copyxattr() is > necessary (I can't really come up with a use case for this). > > So I'd suggest make copyxattr() private, and wait until someone asks > for the functionality.
I agree. If someone needs it, (s)he will be able to advice on useful semantics re replacement. For copy2() it’s a non-issue. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14082> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
